Free cookie consent management tool by TermsFeed
Territorial Readiness for Digital Mobility: Why Low-Density Regions Need Decision-Support Before Attracting Remote Workers
This cover represents the first issue of the NomadVillage Research Series, published in January 2026. The series is an open access institutional publication dedicated to applied research, policy briefs, and technical reports addressing territorial development, rural innovation, and digital mobility.
PDF
PDF (Spanish)
PDF (Portuguese)

Keywords

territorial readiness
digital mobility
decision-support tools
remote workers
low-density regions

Categories

How to Cite

Alves Marcelino, B. C. (2026). Territorial Readiness for Digital Mobility: Why Low-Density Regions Need Decision-Support Before Attracting Remote Workers. NomadVillage Research Series, 1(1), e3. https://doi.org/10.56365/93n05r98

Abstract

This policy brief introduces territorial readiness as the missing step between digital-nomad attraction and sustainable local impact. It argues that before promoting themselves to remote workers, low-density regions need a structured and transparent way to assess whether they can host them well, under what conditions and with what safeguards. The brief defines territorial readiness as the degree to which a place can host remote workers in a technically viable, locally compatible, socially integrative and risk-aware manner. It presents four public dimensions of readiness, capacity, compatibility, integration and risk, and explains why decision-support tools can help municipalities and regional agencies make more accountable, evidence-informed and locally negotiated decisions before launching attraction campaigns.

PDF
PDF (Spanish)
PDF (Portuguese)

References

Camagni, R. (2009). Territorial capital and regional development. In R. Capello & P. Nijkamp (Eds.), Handbook of regional growth and development theories (pp. 118–132). Edward Elgar.

European Commission. (2021). A long-term vision for the EU’s rural areas — Towards stronger, connected, resilient and prosperous rural areas by 2040 (COM(2021) 345 final). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52021DC0345

Kuźmar, S. (2026). From core to periphery? Assessing remote work’s potential to rebalance EU regional development [Preprint; R-MAP dataset]. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.08252

Marcelino, B. C. A. (in preparation). Dinámicas fronterizas: La actuación de los actores culturales Guatá y Fronteras Culturales en la integración cultural y territorial de las fronteras de Brasil, Argentina, Paraguay y Uruguay [Doctoral dissertation in progress]. Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Universität Rostock & Universidade de São Paulo.

Medeiros, E. (2016). Territorial cohesion: An EU concept. European Journal of Spatial Development, (60), 1–30.

OECD. (2023). The surge of teleworking: A new tool for local development? OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2023/09/the-surge-of-teleworking-a-new-tool-for-local-development_6b88f7da/5eb3b9f2-en.pdf

Sciuva, E. (2025). Geographies of digital nomadism: A research agenda. Geography Compass, 19(2), e70016. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.70016

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Bruno César Alves Marcelino (Autor)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.